BUIKWE | In a stunning display of political courage, former Member of Parliament Ibrahim Muwulize has thrust himself into the heart of Uganda’s most contentious debate. At a packed ceremony in Buikwe town, Muwulize broke ranks with the political establishment, condemning the nation’s harsh new anti-LGBTQ+ law. His impassioned plea for equality and human rights has sent shockwaves through the community, igniting discussions from local tea shops to the corridors of power in Kampala. As Uganda grapples with international criticism and internal division, Muwulize’s stance raises a pivotal question: Is this the beginning of a sea change in the nation’s approach to LGBTQ+ rights?
In a bold move, former MP Ibrahim Muwulize publicly denounced Uganda’s contentious Anti-Homosexuality Bill at a Buikwe town ceremony on June 4, 2023. The event, which drew significant attention, saw Muwulize challenge the recently enacted law that imposes severe penalties on same-sex relationships. As the ceremony’s guest of honor, Muwulize argued passionately for equal rights, regardless of sexual orientation. He urged Uganda to embrace principles of freedom and equality, stating, “Discrimination based on personal choices has no place in our society.
Every Ugandan deserves to live freely, without fear.” The ex-MP’s comments come amid widespread debate over the new law, both within Uganda and internationally. While supporters claim it upholds Ugandan values, critics argue it violates fundamental human rights. Responding to an audience query about his planned actions, Muwulize pledged to support efforts challenging the bill and fighting for equal rights. His stance notably diverges from many Ugandan political leaders who back the law.
The Buikwe event provided Muwulize a platform to advocate for marginalized groups and push for a more inclusive Uganda. His message found support among many attendees, contributing to the ongoing dialogue on LGBTQ+ rights in the country. Muwulize’s outspoken criticism signals a growing awareness in some quarters about the need to reconsider laws that restrict individual freedoms, potentially marking a shift in public discourse on this contentious issue.
